DDR Physics & Sensor Architecture

The science behind Differential Depolarization Response

A polarimetric measurement that exploits the structural difference between biological tissue and seawater — enabling fully automated target classification without operator interpretation.

Why polarization state reveals the target

When laser light scatters from a surface, the polarization state of the return depends on the structural symmetry of the scattering medium. Isotropic media — like open ocean water — scatter without preferential polarization direction, producing returns where both orthogonal polarization channels carry approximately equal energy.

Biological tissue is not isotropic. Skin, subcutaneous fat, wetsuit neoprene, and synthetic life vest materials are all built from layered, fibrous, or anisotropic structures that scatter preferentially along one polarization axis. The DDR measurement captures this asymmetry directly as a ratio of the two orthogonal return amplitudes.

The ocean background presents DDR ≈ 0. Biological and synthetic targets present DDR > 0, with approximately 20:1 contrast against the sea surface under all tested sea states up to Beaufort 4.

Ocean water DDR≈ 0.0 (isotropic scatter)
Biological tissue DDR0.15 – 0.35 (anisotropic structure)
Neoprene wetsuit DDR0.20 – 0.40
Life vest material DDR0.25 – 0.45
Contrast ratio≈ 20:1 against sea surface background
Differential Depolarization Response physics diagram
Differential Depolarization Response — polarimetric contrast between isotropic sea surface and anisotropic biological targets

From photons to classification in a single pipeline

DDR processing uses dual-wavelength coherent detection at 1550nm with FMCW ranging. The transmitted beam passes through a polarizing beam splitter before illuminating the target; the return passes through a second orthogonally-oriented splitter, separating it into H and V polarization channels for simultaneous coherent detection.

FMCW modulation provides range gating, allowing the system to bin returns by slant range and reject clutter from rain, spray, and sea surface specular returns that arrive at the wrong range gate. The DDR ratio is computed per range bin per scan line, producing a 2D map of depolarization asymmetry over the search zone.

System architecture diagram showing dual-channel FMCW coherent receiver with polarization demultiplexing
System architecture — dual-channel FMCW coherent receiver with polarization demultiplexing
Wavelength1550nm (eye-safe Class 1M)
Ranging modalityFMCW (frequency-modulated continuous wave)
DetectionBalanced coherent, dual-channel (H + V)
Operating range300m – 5km
DDR computationPer range-bin, per scan line, real-time
OutputScalar classification flag, no image required

Dual 1D silicon photonic phased arrays

The transmit and receive apertures each use a 256-element silicon photonic phased array fabricated on a standard 200mm CMOS-compatible process node. The array steers a collimated 1550nm beam in one axis electronically; the second steering axis is achieved mechanically via a single-axis galvo mirror. This 1D architecture was selected specifically for its manufacturing yield advantage.

A 2D phased array of equivalent aperture requires a 256×256 element grid — 65,536 elements per die — with all elements and their drive circuits within the die area. Yield falls approximately as the square of the 1D yield for the same defect density. A 1D array with 98.5% yield per device produces a 2D equivalent with approximately 74% yield. Twenty 1D dies occupy the same wafer area as one 2D die, and post-test pairing of H and V arrays further improves matched system yield.

1D versus 2D phased array architecture showing wafer layout, yield comparison, and cost model
1D vs 2D phased array architecture — wafer layout, yield comparison, and cost model
Array architecture1D, 256 elements per axis
Fabrication node200mm, CMOS-compatible silicon photonics
1D array yield~98.5% per device at mature node
Equivalent 2D yield~74% (256×256 element grid)
Wafer density advantage20× 1D dies per equivalent 2D die area
Target volume unit cost$600 – $800 vs $50,000 – $200,000 (2D)
Shared aperture and adaptive field of view diagram
Shared aperture and adaptive FOV — transmit/receive aperture co-location and field-of-view steering
Learn More

Technology and IP portfolio

The technology page covers the DDR measurement physics, signal architecture, and hardware design in detail. The IP portfolio page lists patent filings and licensing status.